This post is about two or so months old but I think this post is worth sharing nonetheless.
In the third part of my series on brewing with the Hario V60, I said “Would a continuous pour taste better if I stirred the slurry during the bloom? I wonder.” This question was not exactly on my mind but this morning I decided to make two brews with a continuous pour. I did not want to completely write off a brewing technique without giving it as much of a chance as I felt was appropriate. So many people use a continuous pour – including people with whom I chat about coffee – and so I wanted to give the continuous pour another shot, this time after I had stirred the slurry.
This morning, I set out to use a continuous pour. I started my coffee with a 50 gram bloom, as normal, and then I stirred the coffee using the north-east-south-west technique, and in all directions between those four. At 30 seconds, I started a continuous pour, aiming to pour as slowly as I could in circles. I moved from the centre of the brewer to the outside and back in again until I reached my target brew weight of 250 grams.
I did not have my eye on the clock when I was brewing the first cup. I just said to myself that I wanted to pour slowly. I poured the water in under two minutes at varying rates. Sometimes my flow was a bit quicker, usually when I was pouring at the farthest side of the brewer from where I was standing. My flow sometimes broke – causing little droplets of water to fall rather than a stream – because it is hard to keep a consistent kettle stream.
While flow rate may affect the brew, I just wanted to pour slowly and around in circles. I accomplished this goal. After the brew was finished, I swirled the V60, removing the grounds from the top of the brewer, a technique I picked up from a number of online tutorials. But, I need to do more testing regarding this technique. I know it removes grounds that are stuck to the top walls of the filter paper but why should I do this? If I stop the brew before it fully drains anyway, what impact will these grinds have on the final brew? That is a question for another day.
On tasting my coffee, I felt like the cup was just right. The cup was sweet, the flavours were clear, and I thoroughly enjoyed drinking the cup. There was no excess bitterness like I tasted on my first cups before I was stirring the slurry. The coffee was just good. I tried to replicate this technique again later, on my second cup of coffee. This time, my stream was not as consistent. I broke the stream a few more times. But, the coffee was still great.
Stirring the coffee has changed the way my V60 brews taste. Whereas a continuous pour without a stir imparted an unpleasant bitterness on the cup, stirring the slurry before a continuous pour resulted in a pleasant brew. I am inclined to try the continuous pour a few more times because the cups I made were so delicious. On the Kalita Wave, I did not enjoy my cups brewed using a continuous pour. But maybe I just need to refine my technique.
The V60 requires a lot of practice. I am over a week into using this device and I still feel like I am learning. But, this cup has given me a bit of encouragement to keep going. I think I’ll brew a few more cups with a continuous pour and see if I can break the stream even less. What impact will this have on the brew?
The message I want to convey is that coffee is all about experimentation; trying new things to see what impact they will have on your brew. If you have a cup with which you are not happy, think about what you are doing and then change one thing at a time that you think will improve your brew. I needed to change my stirring technique before I was able to make a better continuous pour. But I like this experimentation; it keeps my mind actively thinking about how to make better coffees, and helps me build up knowledge about what works and what does not work.
Comments and reactions
Respond to this post by sending a Webmention.